Critical thinking through debate

Thinking critically involves seeing things in an open-minded way and examining an idea or concept from as many angles as possible. This important skill allows people to look past their own views of the world and to better understand the opinions of others. It is often used in debates, to form more cogent and well-rounded arguments, and in science. Open-Minded Approach The ability to think critically is essential, as it creates new possibilities in problem solving.

Critical thinking through debate

Menu Critical Thinking Through Debate We often have strong opinions on topics that matter to us, and sometimes, our passion clouds our judgement. For example, you might believe so strongly in the production of organic foods that you would not consider the possible benefits that production of GM crops can bring to developing countries in terms of yield increases for example.

Alternatively, you might believe that genetic engineering is the only way to solve problems of food insecurity and disregard entirely the values of those people who support and advocate for organic production.

Another criticism comes from environmental groups concerned with the rising use of fertilizers and other chemicals in agriculture production.

Critical thinking through debate

Over fertilizing can lead to eutrophication of water bodies creating dead zones that destroy habitat. The list of concerns and crises is long and growing as we increase demand for agricultural products while at the same time, land and other resources become scarcer.

How do we decide which side is right? What arguments should we weigh? In module one we talked about decision making in a world of scarcity.

We set out to discuss trade-offs and incentives and explored how opportunity costs should be considered when we make decisions. There are many costs and benefits to consider, and our aim in society is not always to make the highest profit at least from governmental and social perspectives.

So, we will now use our economic thinking to debate both sides of several issues. The framework I find most helpful I learned from the debate club at the University of Saskatchewan something you might consider if you like to discuss controversial issues.

The mnemonic stands for: Certainly social, economic, and environmental sustainability are three goals we have in long-term decision making and there are clearly trade-offs among them. Revisiting one of the arguments above, we could examine the effects of increasing fertilizer use.

Economically, if the costs of fertilizer use are lower than the increased yield, then we would argue in favour. Another economic argument would be to look at possible externalities. If the run-off and subsequent environmental damage is not included in the analysis, the social costs might outweigh the benefits of increased yield.

Both arguments are based in economic theory, but the latter also includes environmental sustainability. Other arguments that might shed light on the situation are legal are there regulations regarding payment of environmental damages, prohibitions for dumping in a stream or water body, regulated best management practices BMPSetc.?

What could be the political arguments? Moving down the list of debate arguments, we could ask whether we could support greater fertilizer use from an ethical perspective — what do our social morals say about environmental pollution? In the next several sections, consider the different perspectives on each topic using SPLEEEMR, the continuous pursuit of sustainability, and the key economic principles we reviewed in Module 1.

Here are some questions to help you think about each topic: What are the key economic principles that help you to explain each situation?Debate and argumentation advance knowledge, permeates throughout our society, can help personally advance own interests, be a form of bonding and entertainment, and allows us to process and evaluate our constant exposure to argumentation.

39 Perceptions of Students’ Learning Critical Thinking through Debate in a Technology Classroom: A Case Study Sophia Scott Abstract. Critical thinking is often a desired compe-. Debate holds enormous potential to build 21st century skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and conflict resolution in the K classroom, but teachers often struggle to implement and contextualize it effectively.

Let’s play a game called Critical Thinking for the American Adult. I promise it will be fun. First of all, get some popcorn and a coke (in the South, all soft drinks are called “cokes” because we invented the stuff, and we intend to never let you forget it.) Find your favorite seat on the.

This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The digit and digit formats both work/5(2). Critical thinking requires skill at analyzing the reliability and validity of information, as well as the attitude or disposition to do so.

The skill and attitude may be displayed with regard to a particular subject matter or topic, but in principle it can occur in any realm of knowledge (Halpern, ; Williams, Oliver, & Stockade, ).

Critical Thinking Through Argumentation and Debate - eSchedule | Crafton Hills College